I agree with this.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s anonymous from the perspective of the website.

    You have a trusted third party check the ID, so you don’t have to hold that ID data.

    It’s kind like Stripe for credit card processing. You can integrate Stripe into your website and they handle all the credit card details in a way your server never has to see those credit card details.

    • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I understand the protocol. If I have to reveal my identity at any point during a transaction to any party, it is not anonymous. It may maintain some privacy between me and the content owner, but my activities are no longer anonymous.

      “I need privacy, not because my actions are questionable, but because your judgement and intentions are.”

      This goes for corporate and state level actors. I don’t trust Daddy Government or the age verifier to have my best interest in mind when they can start building a profile on the content I consume they deem not suitable for minors.

      There may be a specific flavour of a zero knowledge proofs that works to maintain anonymity. Like, I’d rather pay with monero, and I do so when I can, than stripe for this very reason. My payment activity is decoupled from my real identity used to purchase the monero from a KYC institution.

      That is not what this bill is proposing, so its not anonymous.