Walt Disney Co on Friday said that remarks by activist investor Nelson Peltz criticizing the company for making movies dominated by female and Black actors is evidence that he shouldn’t be on Disney’s board.

Peltz, whose fight to join Disney as a director has become one of the year’s most bitter and closely watched board battles, in an interview with the Financial Times said Disney’s films have become too focused on delivering a message, and not enough on quality storytelling. He specifically took issue with “The Marvels” and “Black Panther.”

“Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?" Peltz said in the interview, published on Friday. "Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

Asked about Peltz’s remarks, a Disney spokesperson responded: “This is exactly why Nelson Peltz shouldn’t be anywhere near a creatively driven company.”

  • hddsx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    It sounds like you’re implying Africans have an inability to develop a technologically advanced society on their own.

    • desentizised@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well how far do you want me to go in refuting that? Would attributing the US space program to the leftover Nazi braintrust be too far? I’m saying what I have said. That no people on their own can truly thrive. We excel when we work together (the moral implications of working with ex white supremacists exist but don’t negate that fact).

      But yea sure we’re talking about a work of fiction. I just thought that people here feel that vibe of Disney pushing diversity for the sake of diversity. I feel like that does raise certain valid points about artistic integrity. And if that makes me sound to you like the guy who can’t stand the thought of a female Bond then that’s you reading stuff into it that I haven’t said.

      To me turning Arielle black is like making Maleficent the protagonist. If something works (not for me personally but for audiences in general) then it will be rewarded accordingly. Whether i.e. The Marvels worked is up for everyone to decide.

      • hddsx
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m just letting you know your previous comment had racist undertones.

        Your comment about turning Ariel black also has racist undertones. Mermaids aren’t real, maybe the black actress was better suited for the role in ways we don’t know about?

        • desentizised@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Well I think you were now given the chance to judge the book by something other than its cover. If you stick with your original assessment that’s entirely your prerogative. I was giving Arielle as an example of something that worked.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes the implication that they sequestered themselves away and somehow progressed alongside the rest of humanity, sorry not only progressing but outpacing the rest of humanity is ridiculous.

      It has nothing to do with them being African, the concept is made ridiculous by simply possessing a working knowledge of what human beings are.