Vladimir Putin staged an elaborate charade—so why did some western media outlets play along?
There was no election in Russia last weekend. There was no campaign. There were no debates, which was unsurprising, because no issues could be debated. Above all, there were no real candidates, bar one: the president of Russia, Vladimir Putin, the man who has just started his fifth, unconstitutional term in office.
Russians did line up at polling stations, but these were not actually polling stations. They were props in an elaborate piece of political theater, a months-long exercise in the projection of power and brutality. While that exercise unfolded, Putin’s only significant political opponent, Alexei Navalny, died under mysterious circumstances in a prison north of the Arctic Circle. Two Russian presidential candidates collected the requisite number of signatures to stand, both said they opposed the war in Ukraine, and both were removed from the ballot. Three practically unknown people were allowed to remain on the ballot, but they did not criticize Putin and did not oppose him in any way. One of them declared that he hoped Putin would win. In Russian-occupied Ukraine, men in balaclavas forced people to vote at gunpoint.
Some Western media nevertheless covered this orchestrated drama as if it really were an election. Reporters interviewed voters, cited “exit polls,” even commented on the “results,” as if these things mean anything in a country whose leadership lies openly about everything: economic statistics, war casualties, Russian history. Reuters ran a headline declaring Putin had won “in a landslide.” The earnest coverage was exactly what Putin hoped he would get.
Water isn’t inherently wet, it makes other things wet
Water molecules make other water molecules wet
Oh my
They do
but they’re still being made wet by the other water molecules and have no inherent wetness of their own
So… Water is wet, unless it’s water vapor and not in contact with other water molecules.
Kinda, water vapor is still water
but the water has no wetness of its own, it isn’t wet unless it’s in contact with more water
Do you often deal with lone molecules of liquid water?
Can’t say I do, but the water is only wet because it’s in contact with the rest of the water— it has no quality of wetness on its own, it can only make other things wet.
(is it even possible to get a lone molecule of liquid water? Like I thought the main three states of matter are decided by how molecules/atoms interact)