• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    but that they never actually ever end up doing because paying high taxes isn’t worth the hassle that uprooting and moving everything to a new country entails.

    Have you honestly calculated both to decide which is more expensive, or it’s just talk?

    Because there have been a few instances of big companies doing just that.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Except not really because what that is is them saying they’re owned or headquartered internationally.

      It’s not reflective of capital flight at the scale of hyper wealthy individuals, just of how fucked corporate tax law is in comparison to income tax law.

      Similar exit tax laws for reheadquartering out of country or selling out to a foreign owner would probably help cut way down on the practice.