Sure it does. They are a group of people with a shared attribute that distinguishes them from other groups. They have shared traditions, history, society, and social treatment. Your own link says the exact opposite of what you wanted it to say if you actually bother to read it and think about it.
How does it not? Just saying that it doesn’t is insufficient. Just saying no is not making a real case. Asking for examples from unrelated sources doesn’t apply. Look at those two sentences and explain how they don’t apply. Or own that you were wrong.
It is such a silly question. The only answer I can give you is no, and you have yet to back up your claim with anything logical like a government form that shows ethnicity includes being trans. Nothing. You are making such a weird claim, yet trying to push the burden on me to disprove your silliness. You can’t even find a single instance of the word being used that way but still claim it to be true.
I literally just called you out on those pathetic deflections. You provided the link. The first two sentences set out the criteria for an ethnicity. I showed which parts applied. You can’t refute it. Your link didn’t have have any mention of government documents. That’s a distraction that you are hoping to latch on to because you were dead wrong about what you said and linked. I’m hoping what is driving you to behave so irrationally is that you find it difficult and embarrassing to admit that you were wrong.
Sure it does. They are a group of people with a shared attribute that distinguishes them from other groups. They have shared traditions, history, society, and social treatment. Your own link says the exact opposite of what you wanted it to say if you actually bother to read it and think about it.
No.
Just saying no doesn’t support your stance. It’s actually kinda sad.
Find me something to back yours. Never once have I heard trans people called an ethnicity.
Ignoring your own-goal and failure to recover isn’t going to work. I found my backing in the first two sentences of your link.
It doesn’t back what you claim. Your lack of understanding is not a failure on my part.
How does it not? Just saying that it doesn’t is insufficient. Just saying no is not making a real case. Asking for examples from unrelated sources doesn’t apply. Look at those two sentences and explain how they don’t apply. Or own that you were wrong.
It is such a silly question. The only answer I can give you is no, and you have yet to back up your claim with anything logical like a government form that shows ethnicity includes being trans. Nothing. You are making such a weird claim, yet trying to push the burden on me to disprove your silliness. You can’t even find a single instance of the word being used that way but still claim it to be true.
I literally just called you out on those pathetic deflections. You provided the link. The first two sentences set out the criteria for an ethnicity. I showed which parts applied. You can’t refute it. Your link didn’t have have any mention of government documents. That’s a distraction that you are hoping to latch on to because you were dead wrong about what you said and linked. I’m hoping what is driving you to behave so irrationally is that you find it difficult and embarrassing to admit that you were wrong.