• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Those are battle flags. That isn’t the confederate flag. At least looking at the photos those are just battle flags. Which are less appropriate than flying the flag for a government.

    My grandma had a battle flag but she never displayed it. It’s because it’s the battle flag her grandpa had in the civil war. Wish someone had the sense to donate it to a museum but I suspect it was disposed of.

    People often confuse the battle flag with the confederate flag. Battle flags were to identify units on the battlefield.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Those are battle flags. That isn’t the confederate flag.

      colloquial - used in ordinary or familiar conversation; not formal or literary

      It is the confederate flag. You know exactly what they meant. Doing an “um achktually” doesn’t rebut their point.

    • horsey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why would that matter and why would a state house be flying a confederate battle flag either?

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a historical tradition. They’ve done it for a very long time. It’s to honor their state citizens who died in the war.

        I think people don’t get, after the war it was about reconciliation.

        The battle flag grew to represent anti-authority. That’s why it became part of the image of the southern outlaw.

        I see no need to fly it but then again I live in Oregon. We had no ties to the confederacy. I find it an odd relic myself.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Is that really what you believe? That they would fly the flag of their failed rebellious nation for reconciliation and not continued defiance? Wouldn’t showing full support for the US as a nation be more of a show of unity?

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Considering it’s documented in history. Yes.

            It was a show of unity to respect the dead confederate soldiers but push the leadership out. That’s what happened.

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s funny you think things like that are “documented”. The South being pretty unhappy with the outcome of the war is “documented” too btw. So why would they still be flying it in 2015? Why honor vets killed in a treasonous rebellion 160 years ago and not say, WW1, WW2, Vietnam, Korea, Iraq or Afghanistan? How about a POW MIA flag?

                • horsey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Because you apparently believe something different and asserted it to me. I didn’t understand the logic of what you said though so I was attempting to discuss it.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    As I said I don’t fly the battle flag and I don’t get why red states fly a democrat flag other than tradition. The confederacy was a failed attempt by the democrats to keep slavery and form a new country. I think everyone needs to be reminded what the democrats did and their flag shouldn’t be celebrated.