• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Facts are not simping. Trump has not been convicted or even charged with rape.

    Why do you hate facts? It’s strange how the left lies then thinks if they repeat them lie, someone will believe them.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You don’t need to be convicted in a court to be a rapist, nor to be called a rapist. Convicted in a court requires the highest burden of proof. That’s not the level of proof we require for general discussions, nor is it for who should or shouldn’t be a candidate for president.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        You actually do. If we used the same criteria we used for Trump then Biden is a rapist as well.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You actually do

          So then OJ isn’t a murderer, is that your stance?

          If we used the same criteria we used for Trump then Biden is a rapist as well. Why, who did Biden rape? What credible evidence is there? What even remotely convincing facts exist to suggest that Biden raped anyone?

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, OJ is not a murderer. He was acquitted of a crime.

            Tara Reade. There is more evidence that Tara Reade was assaulted by Biden than Trump assaulted Jean.

            • Fal@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, OJ is not a murderer. He was acquitted of a crime.

              So the civil jury that found him guilty committed libel? If someone is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, you think that means people in casual conversation couldn’t call them a murderer?

              If you want to call biden a rapist because you think Tara Reade’s account is credible, that’s fine. Go for it. But people are allowed to look at the facts as they see them and make judgments. And just because a jury doesn’t convict someone that doesn’t mean they didn’t commit the crime

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                So the civil jury that found him guilty committed libel? If someone is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, you think that means people in casual conversation couldn’t call them a murderer?

                I don’t know any educated people who would. He was not convicted of murder, and legal libel is a low standard to meet.

                There is zero evidence that Trump committed rape on Jean. She doesn’t know the most basic facts. I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.

                • Fal@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t know any educated people who would.

                  Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure.

                  I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.

                  No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure. What lower crime was he convicted of? I am not aware that OJ has been convicted of any crime.

                    No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse Trump is legally libel for sexual abuse. The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don’t deny that at all.