U.S. Rep. Katie Porter became a social media celebrity by brandishing a white board at congressional hearings to dissect CEOs and break down complex figures into assaults on corporate greed, a signature image that propelled the Democrat’s U.S. Senate candidacy in California.

The progressive favorite known for spotlighting her soccer mom, minivan-driving home life was trounced in Tuesday’s primary election to fill the seat once held by the late Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, finishing far behind Republican Steve Garvey and fellow Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff.

Porter didn’t go down quietly. She immediately pointed a finger at “billionaires spending millions to rig this election.” That claim resulted in a brutal social media backlash from many who were happy to depict the congresswoman as a graceless loser.

Perhaps chastened by the criticism, Porter later clarified her initial statement to say she didn’t believe the California vote count or election process had been compromised, but she didn’t recant her earlier remarks. Rigged, she said in a follow-up, “means manipulated by dishonest means.”

  • girlfreddyOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Her campaign was outspent by a lot because Schiff was backed by big money pac. And he did it in a scummy way.

    I stand behind my usage of the broken clock adage.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      What “big money pac” are you referring to? I’m looking at the data for both Porter and Schiff and they both received PAC money…

      Schiff still out-raised Porter in individual campaign contributions — both big, and small.

      Political Action Committees aren’t really a problem. SuperPACs are.

      By the way…