Measure allows parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses

The Republican-led Kentucky senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for fetuses, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support despite nationwide fallout from a controversial Alabama decision also advancing “fetal personhood”.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation – Senate Bill 110 – won senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

  • Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Okay… Having not actually read the bill in question and only having a cursory understanding of what specifically constitutes a fetus vs an embryo, unborn child (like actively going into labor), etc. this feels like an actually kind of okay thing?

    I mean, obviously the removal of a woman’s rights to control and administer their own bodies is fucking insane and those supporting it should be treated with nothing shy of the most abject contempt one could muster… But the way this article is worded makes it sound like the bill will allow women to seek some form of monetary justice from an unwanted pregnancy? Which feels jarringly contrary to the motivations behind the policys that make this bill necessary?

    Genuinely asking. Am I missing something? Lol

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      What you’re missing is that it’s a step in the direction of establishing fetuses as being treated like humans for things like child support, tax benefits, HOV lane benefits, and so on, with the end goal being able to stand in front of our extremist supreme court and say “Gee, isn’t it funny how we treat fetuses as humans for this, this, and this, but not as humans when it comes to the fourteenth amendment guaranteeing equal protection under the law? You agree? Great! Now that we’ve established that fetuses have rights under the fourteenth amendment, let’s talk about all these pesky blue states that aren’t banning abortion…”

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The correct way to get monetary justice from an unwanted pregnancy is to pay for medical bills, not claim the the clump of cells growing in the person is a child.

    • vynlwombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I kind of read it the same way. What I got from the article is that a single mom could get child support while she’s pregnant. Which seems reasonable to me.