• justJanne@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You pay for something once you know what you’re getting. If you don’t know what you’re getting, it can hardly be argued there was ever a meeting of minds. See the “The Peerless” case.

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You also can’t do whatever the fuck you want with someone else’s property, which IMO supersedes the “getting to know the merchandise”. If the terms of the seller is not sufficient, don’t buy it. Or do buy it, try it out (without damaging or breaking it), and exercise your right to return if you don’t like it. But don’t fuck around with it unless you both agree or you pay.

      • justJanne@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Even if it is damaged or broken, you’d be able to return it for the full price, because you did not get what you were promised (at least in countries with legal warranty)

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Depends on how the product is described and what the warranty covers.

          Like, if these are sold as decorative art pieces, swinging them around probably voids the warranty.

          • justJanne@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            If they are sold as “replica swords”, and the seller assumes this means “display piece” and the buyer assumes this means “larp-usable sword”, the sale is null as no meeting of minds has happened.