"Cox did not profit from its subscribers' acts of infringement," judges rule.

“Cox did not profit from its subscribers’ acts of infringement,” judges rule.

  • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    3·
    9 months ago

    Bizarre ruling that’s for sure.

    In my head, either they are liable and need to pay up (not in my opinion but that would make much more sense) or they are not and need to pay nothing.

    This shit is weird. It’s like accusing someone of helping steal your smartphone and then wanting them buy a pack of Oreos to make it even.