A_A@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 11 months ago[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/sciencemessage-squaremessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up120arrow-down1message-square[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/scienceA_A@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTH1NKTHRICElinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 months agoGood idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
minus-squarehaui@lemmy.giftedmc.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoI mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoI would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.
Good idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
I mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
I would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.