• drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Dude. It’s 2.3% of a massive industrialized nation where most citizens have access to some luxury goods. A nation with nearly 350 million people being the 3rd most populous country.

    It does NOT fucking matter if it’s “”“”““waste””“”“” energy. And no, we don’t fucking make that arguement about things like ac because you know why? Someone is getting comfort out of it instead of burning seals to make a line go up.

    • doylio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      It does NOT fucking matter if it’s “”“”““waste””“”“” energy

      Sounds like you don’t actually care about the energy use, you just hate this for moral reasons. Using excess energy has zero externalities

      • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, its not like we could store that energy in say a battery and then use it another time when demand is higher for actually useful things instead of jerking off techbros/cryptobros.

        • doylio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          I would love if this were an option, but it’s not. The current battery technologies don’t have the scale for grid level storage capacity. The only grid scale storage solution that is really being done is to build very expensive infrastructure that moves water between two dams of different heights, and building more of those doesn’t seem politically likely at the moment

          The reality is that there is much a whole bunch of excess energy supply that is produced because power plants can’t cycle up and down with demand. So they have to keep producing at peak demand 24/7 (there is some nuances based on the type of power plant, NatGas is faster to turn on/off, but this is broadly true)

          I have my qualms with Bitcoin. As a currency it has significant transaction speed problems, and potential security ones after a couple more halvenings. But I don’t see a problem if Bitcoin miners want to pay energy producers to use energy that would be produced anyway and earn the producers nothing.

          • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            There are plenty of projects that use spare computational power for useful things. Like folding@home, which models protein structures to come up with potential drugs. Why not use the excess electricity for one of those?

            • doylio
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That would be great! And I’m sure there are people doing it. And if 2.3% of the US Power grid were dedicated to that I’m sure some people would be upset about it too

              My basic point is I don’t think there is anything morally wrong with Bitcoin miners using energy, even though this is a narrative that is very popular now. There are plenty of other valid criticisms of Bitcoin, but I don’t think this one stands up to scrutiny.