WhatsApp will soon make it possible to chat with people who use other messaging apps. It’s revealed some more details on how that will work.

— Apps will need to sign an agreement with Meta, then connect to its servers.

— Meta wants people to use the Signal Protocol, but also says other encryption protocols can be used if they can meet WhatsApp’s standards

— WhatsApp has been testing with Matrix in recent months, although nothing is agreed yet. Swiss app Threema says it won’t become interoperable

  • guyinachair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I can’t read the full article. I can already get Whatsapp/signal/matrix messages on beeper whats changing for Whatsapp?

    • Greg Clarke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’ll be end to end encrypted. As far as I’m aware, beeper needs access to messages send cross platform

      • Disinfect056@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “End to end” lol if meta owns the keys there is not such a thing as End to end. Unless they open the code of whatsapp like Signal does we cna never truat their “end to end”

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Isn’t the just based on a matrix server connecting to all your accounts?

      What the EU forces them to do is to be able to send messages across service borders, so you could communicate with someone on WhatsApp, for example, without having an account there yourself.

      I do share the most upvoted comment’s skepticism though - Meta and Apple will fight this tooth and nails and make it so cumbersome (and opt-in, of course), it will have no relevance in practice.

      As a Signal user I’m also not happy that the very least I have to share with Meta is my phone number (that’s also criticism towards Signal though, I guess).