• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As long as anyone else is prohibited off duty, the same should apply. If there’s a safety argument for a trucker, for example, an officer should be held to at least as high a standard.

      I haven’t paid attention to this issue since it doesn’t affect me, but are we still at the stage of no good way to tell whether a person is “under the influence”, vs chemical traces for weeks after?

      It seems like a timing requirement might be more effective and fair: for example pilots can’t fly within 8 hours of drinking alcohol. I can definitely see a similar requirement to help ensure you’re not under the influence while putting public safety at risk

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Bet this police union has had different opinions on marijuana in the past when it suited them…

  • Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Split on this, bc fuck pigs, but maybe if they smoked some weed they’d chill the hell out and stop killing innocent people/animals/etc.