Scientists say they’ve identified an alternative way to test for recent marijuana use that’s significantly more accurate than standard THC blood tests that sometimes misrepresent a person’s potential impairment depending on frequently they use cannabis. And they’re actively working to build on that research with an expanded study. The initial study, which was funded in […]
By comparison, testing for THC alone “yielded 88 percent specificity, 73 percent sensitivity and 80 percent accuracy.
That’s what we use now. So it’s a significant improvement. Right now we’re taking away rights with an error rate of 1/5. Anything that improves that is good.
Sure, but also:
That’s what we use now. So it’s a significant improvement. Right now we’re taking away rights with an error rate of 1/5. Anything that improves that is good.