SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 year agoUsing agency workers to cover strikes found to be unlawfulwww.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1144arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkUsing agency workers to cover strikes found to be unlawfulwww.bbc.co.ukSbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareamanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoY is a reason to make that decision. One is more applicable legally. They are both reasons behind the decision. I’ll leave you to your feelings.
minus-squarekenbw2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI think this is easily solved. I think both of you are right/wrong in your logic. Judge A has an undisclosed reason X for a decision Union Head B presents reason Y for a decision X could equal Y. But we have no evidence either way. So X and Y could be entirely different or they could be the same
Y is a reason to make that decision. One is more applicable legally. They are both reasons behind the decision.
I’ll leave you to your feelings.
I think this is easily solved. I think both of you are right/wrong in your logic.
Judge A has an undisclosed reason X for a decision
Union Head B presents reason Y for a decision
X could equal Y. But we have no evidence either way. So X and Y could be entirely different or they could be the same