distantsounds@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoWhite House calls for legislation to stop Taylor Swift AI fakeswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1285arrow-down136file-text
arrow-up1249arrow-down1external-linkWhite House calls for legislation to stop Taylor Swift AI fakeswww.theverge.comdistantsounds@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square147fedilinkfile-text
cross-posted from: https://mbin.grits.dev/m/mews/t/22301 White House calls for legislation to stop Taylor Swift AI fakes
minus-squareSusaga@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·10 months agoIf the image is even slightly convincing, it’s essentially just defamation with digital impersonation thrown in. Yeah, that might catch photoshop in its net, but you’d need to be a DAMN good artist to get caught in it as well.
minus-squareNoIWontPickaName@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·10 months agoSo what level is slightly convincing? What about people that happen to look like someone famous? What level of accuracy is necessary? If I label some random blonde ai generated porn “Taylor Slow”, does that count? They are both blonde after all.
If the image is even slightly convincing, it’s essentially just defamation with digital impersonation thrown in. Yeah, that might catch photoshop in its net, but you’d need to be a DAMN good artist to get caught in it as well.
So what level is slightly convincing?
What about people that happen to look like someone famous?
What level of accuracy is necessary?
If I label some random blonde ai generated porn “Taylor Slow”, does that count?
They are both blonde after all.