There is no way that it should be done and as a separate unrelated argument there is no was to do it that does not run afoul of The United States Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
It should not be done because it should not be done and there also does not exist a “proper” way it could ever be done.
State executions are an affront to decency and besmirch the dignity of humanity. They are also inherently cruel.
No power which executes the captive holds moral authority to hold people captive.
It’s more humane than lethal injection, the only other way we do it, which I think is the argument here
deleted by creator
Trying to +1 you but the comment won’t load right when I click
Yeah, shit you’re right
There is no way that it should be done and as a separate unrelated argument there is no was to do it that does not run afoul of The United States Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
It should not be done because it should not be done and there also does not exist a “proper” way it could ever be done.
State executions are an affront to decency and besmirch the dignity of humanity. They are also inherently cruel.
No power which executes the captive holds moral authority to hold people captive.
Lethal injection with heroin or carfentanyl would be pretty humane I would say