Without more information, it’s hard to know if they were a threat or over zealous prosecution.
Finally something that isn’t just deflection or an attempt to put words in someone’s mouth.
Let’s see, he:
is a criminal (assaulting officers and destruction of government property during Jan 6th)
plotted to kill 37 FBI agents (including some that were investigating his criminal actions from Jan 6
is now charged with conspiracy, retaliating against a federal official, interstate communication of a threat and solicitation to commit a crime of violence
he “obtained a list of law enforcement personnel who participated in that criminal investigation and the two discussed plans to kill individuals on the list in conversations with a cooperating witness. Those plans included an attack on the FBI’s Knoxville Field Office.” “A witness, who was described as a coworker and a very good friend to Carter, met with Kelley and Carter in early December when Kelley discussed assassination missions that would target federal agents.” “On Dec. 13, Carter gave the witness an envelope from Kelley that contained 37 names and some phone numbers of the law enforcement personnel who participated in his criminal investigation, as well as a thumb drive of video footage from a warrant search of Kelley’s home in May.”
is quoted as having said “With us being such a small group we will mainly conduct recon missions and assassination missions.”
Do you really think it’s okay to not answer questions in a context like this? Doesn’t it come across to yourself like “gee, I can’t answer these questions and keep my position here, maybe my position’s wrong”, like at all?
‘Hey let’s go kill some federal agents’ isn’t venting.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Finally something that isn’t just deflection or an attempt to put words in someone’s mouth.
Let’s see, he:
is a criminal (assaulting officers and destruction of government property during Jan 6th)
plotted to kill 37 FBI agents (including some that were investigating his criminal actions from Jan 6
is now charged with conspiracy, retaliating against a federal official, interstate communication of a threat and solicitation to commit a crime of violence
he “obtained a list of law enforcement personnel who participated in that criminal investigation and the two discussed plans to kill individuals on the list in conversations with a cooperating witness. Those plans included an attack on the FBI’s Knoxville Field Office.” “A witness, who was described as a coworker and a very good friend to Carter, met with Kelley and Carter in early December when Kelley discussed assassination missions that would target federal agents.” “On Dec. 13, Carter gave the witness an envelope from Kelley that contained 37 names and some phone numbers of the law enforcement personnel who participated in his criminal investigation, as well as a thumb drive of video footage from a warrant search of Kelley’s home in May.”
is quoted as having said “With us being such a small group we will mainly conduct recon missions and assassination missions.”
Sources:
https://www.wate.com/news/tennessee/maryville-man-january-6-fbi-knoxville-office-attack-plan-trial-delayed/
https://www.wate.com/news/crime/two-planned-attack-fbi-knoxville-office-january-6-investigators/
https://www.wate.com/news/top-stories/east-tennesseei-40-i-75-icy-conditions-overturned-tractor-trailer/?nxsparam=1&nxstory_autoturn=1
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/16/us/politics/jan-6-defendant-assassination-plot.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/capitol-riot-defendant-planned-kill-fbi-agents-investigated-unsealed-f-rcna62214
Seems reasonable to me to consider him to be a threat.
deleted by creator
Right back to deflection again. Damn, I was hopeful for once.
deleted by creator
I’ll answer your questions when they start being honest.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It isn’t venting. Quit trying to deflect.
deleted by creator
Are you going to address my statement about venting, or are you just going to continue to deflect?
deleted by creator
How childish.
Do you really think it’s okay to not answer questions in a context like this? Doesn’t it come across to yourself like “gee, I can’t answer these questions and keep my position here, maybe my position’s wrong”, like at all?
Take it up with winter. You get what you take. Winter isn’t addressing my points, so I’m not going to address theirs.
I will not put in effort that is not being recieved.