The article says that “Most taxpayers would view this outcome as a ‘good thing.’” But that is only true if, contrary to fact, “most taxpayers” have lower income growth than inflation.

I think we’re talking past each other a bit instead of really disagreeing. I get your perspective that, given that one’s income is fixed, it’s better to pay less in taxes to reflect how much poorer you’ve become. Sure, that makes sense.

But here’s another perspective: the tax brackets are adjusted for inflation because inflation exists. Income tax wouldn’t function otherwise. So, if you’re paying less nominal taxes, it’s only because this year you’re poorer than the last. That is a strange thing to celebrate.