• CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m holding off until I see how they monetize the game. I’m totally turned off of MTX-laden GaaS bullshit after Darktide.

    • SpathiFwiffo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Helldivers 1 gated a lot of weapons behind DLC.
      I’d assume that this would be the same; but i guess micro-transactions are more of a thing than they were 5 years ago.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t love how many DLCs there are for Helldivers 1 but that way of doing things has some advantages over in-game shit with funny money credits that you can’t buy in the amounts you actually need. The most important one imo: the monetization is in plain-sight, visible before you even buy the game. Like Paradox strategy games, if the DLC being worth more than the game (sometimes several times over) bothers you, at least they’re upfront about it.

        Darktide goes to some lengths to hide that its skin packs cost a lot, and some new or particularly desirable ones cost more than the amount of aquilas you get from the “Imperial” edition.

        • PenguinTD
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I post somewhere but how they do the monetization is gonna change how I am gonna buy the game. I had the original helldiver free from ps plus, like it so when steam on sale I bought it later with all the DLC included. I would support them if they did a good job on PC, but only so when it’s reasonable.

          I do not mind the skins or cosmetics too much, but more like contents affects how you play the game, helldiver 1 has this issue that’s why I bought when all the dlc are included.