• Tremble@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I doubt they would confirm before they had tested every bolt on a few planes

    Or at least one, testing every bolt, or at least this bolt on a bunch of them

    But they would need a sensitive tool to measure torq needed to unlock it that’s kinda cool

    • girlfreddy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Loose bolts indicate vibration, and that is a death knell for Boeing … because their engineers should have known how many bolts would be needed and the torque required to lock them in.

      Boeing will pay through the nose for this screw up.

      • Wolf_359@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, they’ll keep getting exceptions for the 737 max until they have the worst plane crash in history. Then something might be done and bigger changes might be made.

        • becausechemistry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Realistically, how much worse could they get? The disasters so far have only been limited by the number of people they can kill due to the plane’s capacity.

          Probably would have been different if they failed after taking off from New York or Chicago instead of Indonesia or Ethiopia, because, of course.

          • Wolf_359@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think a plane crashing into a populated city or neighborhood would up those numbers quite a lot though. And yeah, good point. I think another reason the 737 max issues haven’t been taken more seriously yet is because the two big accidents involved people from developing nations. Imagine if those planes were full of Americans.