• Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s wasn’t just an act on free speech. It was an attack on culture and integration. Now I do not think you should try to antagonize others just for jollies but even the United States displays an imagine of mo.

    • uzi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes it was.

      I thought Charlie Hebdo was disgusting for mocking all levels of decency, personal values, and faith or religious teachings.

      That being said, insulting values or religion is protected speech, as long as that protection goes both ways. I don’t see athiests or Satanists advocating for freedom of religion and the public teaching of God, so what athiests and satanists teach is not protected since they would never allow Judaism, Islam, Sikhism, etc.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not a fan of mocking religions but I think murdering people is extreme. To me it’s an easy target to attack religion. Yet rarely does it it provide any substance.