Pornhub blocks Montana and North Carolina as their age verification laws take effect | The website says the states’ ID requirement would put users’ privacy at risk::Montana and North Carolina are the latest to join the list of states with age verification laws for adult platforms.

  • TugOfWarCrimes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. They would rather effective age verification that doesn’t negatively impact the privacy and liberties of their users. They want a solution, not just a ham fisted excuse to start building the foundations of a social credit system

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      While care is required, designing a system that only proves that someone is over a specific age is possible without leaking much additional information.

      For example a request for age verification can be generated and signed by the porn site. All it needs is a unique ID and the signature. It should expire quickly and can only be used once.

      The person identifying themself can send this request to a certifying party (the government in the EU where we trust governments, or I guess some terrible for profit company in the USA because they privatize everyday). The certifying party can sign the request, since they know how old the person is.

      The person then returns this verification to the porn site.

      In this scenario the porn site never learns anything about the user other than that they are above a given age. The certifying party only knows that the person has gotten an age verification, but not why or where.

      There is still possible collusion between the porn site and the verifying party, but in that case the system is not really needed at all. Also metadata tracking is possible (like when a person gets a request and has network traffic to a porn site), but can be mitigated if a user is concerned.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not nearly as afraid of a porn site having information about people as I am about governments having a list of who watches porn on what sites

        • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is that if a porn site has the information they can be compelled to pass that information on, or it can be revealed by data breaches.

        • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did I? I’m not sure how. The person visiting would only use the verification request once. It’s only good for a single request. How could this be used for tracking?

          • mcribbs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You didn’t… If anything you’ve described something closer to OAuth or JWT. You’re just getting hit by people who don’t know how cookies actually work.