sunnie to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agono.. just noimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1568arrow-down119
arrow-up1549arrow-down1imageno.. just nosunnie to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·1 year agoThat’s XML though… not that I’m disagreeing.
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down1·1 year agoNot XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.
minus-squaredukk@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoThe worst of both worlds…
minus-squarekarmiclychee @sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’s like a weaponized grade of whatever they made CSS in JS out of
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIf you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML. Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.
That’s XML though… not that I’m disagreeing.
Not XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.
Gross.
The worst of both worlds…
It’s like a weaponized grade of whatever they made CSS in JS out of
deleted by creator
If you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML.
Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.