A cop’s decision to sport a body camera and search a Massachusetts middle school for a book has raised serious concerns among civil liberties experts, a new report shows.

The Berkshire Eagle reported Wednesday on mounting fears after the Great Barrington plainclothes police officer who entered an eighth grade classroom at W.E.B. Du Bois Regional Middle School.

“Police going into schools and searching for books is the sort of thing you hear about in communist China and Russia," Ruth A. Bourquin, senior and managing attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, told the local news outlet. "What are we doing?”

For their part, police say they were obligated to investigate a complaint about the book “Gender Queer” by Maia Kobabe, a memoir about gender identity that contains sexually explicit illustrations and language, the report notes.

  • TheChurn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    The problem with the principal refusing to escort the officer is then they are obstructing a police investigation, and that is a crime. It isn’t fair to put this burden on them, the blame lies squarely with the police chain of command.

    In fact the root problem of all things police is that once police decide to do something, even if that thing is illegal, interfering is a crime.

    This is how we end up with people being charged with resisting arrest, and no other crimes that would warrant an arrest. This is also how we end up with a bunch of people live streaming George Floyd’s execution, because stopping a cop from killing someone is a crime.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Should have asked them to come back with a warrant as that is within his legal rights. The officer had no reason to suspect any real harm to any child in a school classroom after hours (this all happened after school was out for the day).

      • TheChurn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        With a complaint and a full description of the offense, the officer had cause to force entry.

        Same as if someone called in a suspicious package, they wouldn’t need a warrant to gain entry.

        Society gives police an incredible amount of leeway.

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          On the complaint of a book? I’ll call bullshit on that, and no way that would hold up in any sane court. A book is not something that should give police any probable cause, and really something that the police shouldn’t even be investigating. Having police coming in to schools to look for books is so far out of what they should be doing the principal should have laughed and called the station to ask what the hell is going on over there.

          • TheChurn@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I agree with you, but it doesn’t change the implications of a police officer having a complaint and a sufficient description to follow up on it without a warrant.

            It is at their discretion, same as if you called in that your grandma didn’t answer the phone, they could ignore it or bust down the door. Both would be fully legal.

            Court is a different matter. A judge could say there wasn’t cause to search after the fact, but that won’t change what the police do in the moment.