• PostAndRun@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If it was anything more than an advisory body no one would ever get it to pass a referendum. If they skipped the constitution by legislating something with more teeth than it currently is the Coalition would spend now until election time campaigning against it about how it was “forced” on people instead of it being a referendum.

    • phonyphanty@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, sort of agreed on the toothless comment. I was big on the Voice when I first heard about it, and I’m still for it, but I’m a lot more pessimistic about its strength now. Maybe it’ll make more sense when the whole Uluru Statement is established.