• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Exactly why I didn’t bring it up.

    Still haven’t addressed the methodology of the “real” astrologers in that study, and again, still not relevant.

    Read this once again, slowly:

    I did not claim astrology was accurate.

    My claim was that it was not -always- vague.

    A report does not have to be accurate to be specific.

    You are arguing against a claim I did not make instead of the one I did make.

    • Tavarin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Read the paper.

      And just because you read something as specific does not make it specific. I already sent you information about the Barnum effect, which you repeatedly ignored.

      You know nothing of science, how dare you make any claims that I do not.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There it is again, diverting from my actual position to argue again something else.

        Since obviously you flunked middle school science:

        Precision =/= accuracy. You continue to argue against the accuracy of astrology, which was not a part of my position.

        • Tavarin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There you go, never answering any actual questions.

          Go away liar.