This iconic mouse is weeks away fromn being in the public domain Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when ‘Steamboat Willie’ enters the public domain

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Open environments are way more productive and creative then lock stuff for decades.

    Source?

    The idea of copyright and patents is to ensure that you can get compensated for your own work. There’s no point in creating a unique idea when Disney can just copy it and take all the money for themselves.

    There are flaws with how copyright and patents are implemented, but that doesn’t mean they’re fundamentally broken. The alternative would be much worse.

      • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        CC is a great alternative for some cases, but far from all. Most artists want to protect their work, and CC don’t help with that.

        How much Creative Commons media do you consume?

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look at Linux and open source projects as a whole, like Lemmy, or how 3D printer community flourished after some 80s patents lost their validity and so on…

      Disney can just copy it

      They are the ones who most profit from this CR and patent scheme, if they would profit from open projects they would lobby in that direction not the other way around

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find copyright and patents very different, at least in the U.S. I support copyright, but not patents. Patents are used to stifle creativity and generate lawsuits.

      Example, I designed something and was urged to patent it. It combines hardware, electronics, and in some iterations software as well. I released it copyleft instead. People make it in their garage, cottage industry sells it, a multinational profits from it.

      The current designs are much better than my original. If I had patented it it might stagnate, or I could litigate and try to prevent innovation.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So sounds like we should be arguing to abolish the need for employment to survive instead of defending the status quo.