President Joe Biden goes into next year’s election with a vexing challenge: Just as the U.S. economy is getting stronger, people are still feeling horrible about it.

Pollsters and economists say there has never been as wide a gap between the underlying health of the economy and public perception. The divergence could be a decisive factor in whether the Democrat secures a second term next year. Republicans are seizing on the dissatisfaction to skewer Biden, while the White House is finding less success as it tries to highlight economic progress.

“Things are getting better and people think things are going to get worse — and that’s the most dangerous piece of this,” said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who has worked with Biden. Lake said voters no longer want to just see inflation rates fall — rather, they want an outright decline in prices, something that last happened on a large scale during the Great Depression.

  • Nudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    When the economy is doing well, that means businesses are doing well. When businesses do well, the workers are paid less. The economy is not your friend.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or some people like to say “the stock market is not the economy”. Which I think points in the same general direction.

        • BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe average but I’m not sure that’s particularly relevant here. We’re talking about wages, not wealth. It’s the latter that your Bezos’s, Zucks, etc can potentially throw off when measuring averages.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still, it would be interesting to see the distribution of these wages, whether the whole distribution shifted uniformly to increase the average, or it just became more skewed

            • BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can only go by the words that you use when you ask a question my guy, and the words you used indicated that you were asking if it was the average (mean) OR the middle figure in the distribution of incomes (median).

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Average” can mean either mean, median, or mode. You’re the one who doesn’t know what words mean, not me.

                • BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Regardless of whether that’s technically true, the context in my initial comment made it clear that the answer to your question is “mean”, did it not? I specifically cited those wealthy outliers to exclude median since outliers wouldn’t change a median value, after all.