Internet references conflating the two films drew anger in Japan, which was twice attacked by nuclear weapons during the second world war

Internet references conflating the two films drew anger in Japan, which was twice attacked by nuclear weapons during the second world war

  • apemint@lemmy.world
    221·
    1 year ago

    And if Japan hadn’t surrendered, it would have been used up to a dozen times.

    The third bomb, and the others that may have followed, were a definitive part of the American strategy to end World War II. Although hopeful that nuclear weapons might end the war, American officials—from President Truman to his commanding officers—did not expect the war to end right away. Signs indicated that more atomic weapons were necessary, and U.S. leaders were rapidly moving to order more atomic strikes. Had the war continued, more atomic bombs would very likely have been used.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      10·
      1 year ago

      While that is true, as declassified documents show, it’s important to note they didn’t have that many more bombs ready at the moment (IIRC they did have a third one ready to be dropped) but they were being manufactured as quickly as they could, so the war would have to last a while for all of them to be used. But they planned to, which is a little scary

      • apemint@lemmy.world
        75·
        1 year ago

        Yes, the article mentions the manufacturing bottleneck.

        It’s insane that after seeing the effects of the first 2 bombs, military leaders still lobbied for more to be dropped.

        • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.eeEnglish
          172·
          1 year ago

          The nuclear bombs were hardly more cruel than any other part of WW2. Nukes killed a comparatively low number of people. Per unit, nukes are scary, but it was just a drop in the bucket.