Some members of the committee said such a ban, proposed two months after a prominent conservative activist was caught meeting with a famous white supremacist, might be a “slippery slope” or too vague.
Some members of the committee said such a ban, proposed two months after a prominent conservative activist was caught meeting with a famous white supremacist, might be a “slippery slope” or too vague.
Thats a clear violation of the first amendment, freedom of association. Am I misreading the article?
First amendment doesn’t apply to rules private political affiliations insist upon for their members.
OOOOH On second read that’s incredibly obvious. I thought someone proposed a bill or something. That makes much more sense.