• joelfromaus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Everytime I consider buying an EV I do some research and they always seem to have all of the bells and whistles. Then I get to price and it’s like $60,000+ and I can’t help but wonder how much cheaper it could be without all of the added features.

    Edit: I’m not going to reply to everyone and I really should have mentioned since it’s not immediately obvious but I’m Australian. No Chevy volt and and all vehicles are imported increasing prices on top of the usual AUD imbalance.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. Just this, so much. How much would a battery, an electric engine and safety shit cost?

      • evranch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen conversion kits for old trucks under $10k. So there’s your answer.

        Unfortunately said kits are often lacking in range unless you’re willing to fill your truck box with batteries, because you can’t really retrofit a “skateboard” style battery.

        I literally want that skateboard with seats and a steering wheel. Hell, give me a diesel burning heater and a washer fluid bulb I have to stomp on like I have in my old truck, I’m not picky

    • Acters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chevy bolt at least has half of the features but still quite a few, I would say a very set of features to include, but I do imagine it would only shave less than 5k if the bolt had the most basic of features. That means it would be 1-2k cheaper as a used vehicle. I do think it’s the more reasonable priced vehicle, and we need more competitors to this vehicle. On the other hand, most of the cost is the battery and it just something researchers must be paid to bring innovations for and its just not reasonable to pay them cheap as they are doing a great thing for humanity. However, this forces companies to charge higher prices and should instead be subsidized without trademark/IP protections restricting its adoption.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only reason they didn’t is because China is getting ready to ship stupid cheap cars to the US.

          • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is that true? Last I heard they couldn’t pass safety regulations.

            I would be for it, we need more companies to show Hyundai how to child proof cars… By child proof I mean making sure the car isn’t so easy to steal, a child could do it.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              China can’t but their corporations are welcome to submit cars to American testing to sell here. Look up Greely Automotive.

              • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Greely Automotive.

                I have never heard of them. I’m not knowledgeable on cars but their newest generation looks very interesting. If they can break the US market, I hope they can lower prices. Thank you for bringing them to my attention.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Last year I bought new Citroen e-berlingo for 25.000€. It would be €32.000 without subsidies but still not 60.000.