If they are supposed to certify results, then wouldn’t that mean they also have the ability to say “I think this shouldn’t be certified”, otherwise what is the point of certifying?
To me, this seems more like the Dems being fascists, to borrow a lefty term.
it’s the part where they violated a court order to certify. they had a chance to say “I think this shouldn’t be certified” and explain why. They failed to do so to the court’s satisfaction, the court ruled that they were disrupting for the sake of disruption, the court ordered them to certify, and they still refused.
I’d like to be an election official and say “I think all these votes for republicans shouldn’t be certified.” I mean, that’s my job right? So, you’ve already agreed it’s not a big deal
I’m not sure what the problem is here.
If they are supposed to certify results, then wouldn’t that mean they also have the ability to say “I think this shouldn’t be certified”, otherwise what is the point of certifying?
To me, this seems more like the Dems being fascists, to borrow a lefty term.
They refused to certify it because they didn’t like the outcome.
deleted by creator
it’s the part where they violated a court order to certify. they had a chance to say “I think this shouldn’t be certified” and explain why. They failed to do so to the court’s satisfaction, the court ruled that they were disrupting for the sake of disruption, the court ordered them to certify, and they still refused.
I’d like to be an election official and say “I think all these votes for republicans shouldn’t be certified.” I mean, that’s my job right? So, you’ve already agreed it’s not a big deal
deleted by creator