• axehomeless@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    But even hardcore gender social constructivists don’t argue for more than 2 sexes? Or have I misread the literature?

    • ViciousNakedMoleRat@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are quite a few people who argue for sex as a spectrum. Which doesn’t make biological sense and is neither helpful for intersex people nor for transgender people.

    • prettysureitsmaddie@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The person you’re replying to is wrong, translating the word as gender makes the most sense here. That said, sex isn’t strictly binary ~1.5% of people are intersex, which means when they’re born, they don’t fit the typical definition of male or female.

          • FireZeLazer@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s a common figure that you will often see but it’s wrong.

            It’s based on an academic paper that included a large range of non-intersex conditions that affect phenotype.

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/

            Actual chromosomal difference (which is what intersex refers to) is about 0.02%.

      • axehomeless@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        that means 98.5% of all people have either xx or xy karyotypes, right?

        The discussion always hinges upon disagreements what to do with those 98.5%. Not about what are those 1.5%.

        Thats what I mean.

        • prettysureitsmaddie@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          In my experience, the conservative side of it tends to be reductive like that, trans advocacy has been getting better at including intersex advocacy as well because the two groups have overlapping needs. I mostly mentioned it because it was interesting and relevent though.

          • axehomeless@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Again, this is all well and good, it just fails to grasp the discourse and tries to establish a topic the other side has no interest in. Its literally miscomunication.

            I’m just sick of all the people talking past each other hoping that if they do it long enough the other side will come back to the debate on their turf which never happens.

            Why do people do that?

      • zaviex@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        FYI, most medical literature will refer to intersex genotypes as male or female still with the presence of the Y chromosome generally defining the sex. For instance if you look up XXY on Wikipedia or similar, it will usually say “XXY male”. On crossover events, it’s still characterized as male and female but usually as “XX male” and “XY female”

      • axehomeless@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Those are literally abberations and detract from the actual discussions. Nobody cares about those edge cases, discussions only go there if there is a “but actually…” thing going on

        like you just did

        • Prosthemadera@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No one cares, except for all the people who do.

          Maybe the problem is that people don’t care and make uninformed statements?

          • Ludoban@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            But its literally the same as if someone asks „how many fingers are on a human hand?“, the answer being 5 and you going „actually the answer is 0-10“ because some people with deformations got born with more or less fingers than usual.

            The problem isnt uninformed people, the thing is most people are more than aware about these things but are just able to see whats the point of the discussion and dont want to derail it.

            • DontWorryImSad@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The difference there is that no one discriminates or denies the existence of people with more or less than 10 fingers.

    • circa285@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know what a “gender social constructivist” is, but I do know that from a medical standpoint there are more than two biological sexes.