• cmhickman358@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for covers, it’s interesting to hear someone else’s take on a particular song, but remixes where all they change is just the pitch and/or tempo are just lazy and unappealing.

    • BassaForte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A good remix changes the song enough to sound like a different song but with inspirations from the original. A bad remix just changes the tempo and layers garbage on top. Not all remixes are bad but many of them are low effort.

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or they add a bunch of trap/dubstep nonsense and lazy stuttered and repeated vocals. It’s been done to death.

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I personally don’t like either. It feels like I’m the uncanny valley of music and it makes me want to hear the song I heard first.

      • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What about when both are massively different?

        Feint - Starscapes and Feint - Starscapes (Rameses B remix) don’t sound similar to me at all, for instance. The original is too generic and uninspired.