I have a question about prevailing ideas on socialism. I am a software developer. Say I start a company and I am the sole employee and I write some code that is profitable. Then I decide to leave, I transfer the business to someone else or a group of people. The buisnesses is still running, under other workers, but I still have productive code in the pipelines. Do I get to “own” a share of this business for the rest of my life like a capitalist?
Similarly, let’s say I’m an artist who wrote a book. I write the book and want to distribute it. Do I get to own a permanent share in the distribution profit, even if my work is complete, in perpetuity?
I guess both are examples of intellectual property, which I’m usually against, but assume a libertarian socialist society not a society where markets are eliminated or welfare is plentiful, just one where capitalists no longer own the means of production.
I suppose the ethical anti capitalist solution is to sell your rights to the production workers. Or maybe to cap potential profits off a work (but that would require government intervention id assume?)
I was going to make another post about this other topic, but how am I necessarily supported by the community under socialism? Eliminating capitalists and the workers owning the means of production just means the elimination of “bosses”, workplace democracy, ownership over your labor, etc. It doesn’t obligate a form of welfare. I do see socialism having nationalized industries, especially those that provide needs which make for bad markets, and I can even see taxes paying for goods from these industries, but I feel like that’s an entirely different question than workers owning their labor, namely because we could literally do that right now under social democracy too!