BT is offering me speeds of 60 mbps, while Shell is offering 90 mbps. Shell’s minimum gaurenteed speed is 70 mpbs and BT’s is 50 mpbs. They both use Openreach cables. Will there be any difference?

  • Left-Somewhere2528@alien.topOPB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    thanks. I don’t understand why Shell would be able to offer one Openreach product, but BT wouldn’t offer the same product to the address.

    • KernelDecker@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      90 is slow for gfast and possibly below a threshold that BT are happy to sell it at.

      Is the shell product called ultrafast or superfast?

        • KernelDecker@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes so that is the gfast product, a lot of providers dont sell it at all, or only do if the property is likely to get 150mbps.

            • KernelDecker@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, id argue bt is overpriced. But a gfast forecast of 90+ is borderline not worth the extra money imho.

              Ive previously had gfast and it was on the low end of the estimates at my address and i fought with disconnections for about a year before openreach finally found a fault. In my experience its Much more more sensitive to issues that superfast.

            • KernelDecker@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had it with EE, at the time zen and others were selling it. There used to be a list on the openreach website