• Showroom7561
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    How is that not cruel?

    Having known that capital punishment by lethal injection would be the consequence of his actions, he decided his own fate.

    Even prison could be considered cruel, or compassionate, depending on your perspective.

    Really, though, this man murdered six people. I think you’re giving his feelings far too much consideration.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      How did he know that would be the consequences of his actions when plenty of people have been sentenced to life in prison for similar actions? How did he know he wouldn’t be dealing with a hung jury? Unless he was able to predict the future, which he could not, suggesting he knew that ‘capital punishment by lethal injection’ would be the consequences of his actions is ridiculous. On top of that, he may literally not know the difference between right and wrong, something that is entirely possible. In which case, again, he would not have known the consequences of his actions.

      And it’s not about his feelings. The law shouldn’t be sidestepped just because a crime is very bad. Otherwise, why not just let police kill people like him and avoid trial completely?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure why you think this specific case should be an exception when it comes to whether or not a law is ethical or even legal based on the U.S. Constitution. Even if this specific guy wanted to die, many very clearly did not. Including the innocent people that have been executed.

          https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/innocence/executed-but-possibly-innocent

          Should whether or not something is legal be decided on a case-by-case basis or should the law apply equally for everyone? Because I would certainly say the latter.

          • Showroom7561
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Friend, I’m not saying I support capital punishment. No doubt that there have been innocent people put to death (often people of colour), and that would be a failing of the justice system. Even the idea of capital punishment makes me sick.

            But in the context we find ourselves in, the way Creech has been treated couldn’t possibly have been more humane or compassionate. He’s already tried to kill himself, saying he does not want to be stuck in prison for the rest of his life.

            How would you go about making this situation better for this murderer? Or the family of his victims?

            Should whether or not something is legal be decided on a case-by-case basis or should the law apply equally for everyone? Because I would certainly say the latter.

            Well, sentencing is done on a case-by-case basis. Which is why some people who commit especially brutal types of violent murders are given a harsher penalty vs someone who may have killed in the heat of the moment. This is probably as fair as you can get, since some crimes obviously shouldn’t get the same heavy had as others.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Sentencing is done within the limit of the law and, again this is not about him specifically.

              You can’t sentence someone to die by a thousand cuts because that is cruel. Which violates the Constitution. Why is this not cruel? Because it’s faster?

              • Showroom7561
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Sentencing is done within the limit of the law and, again this is not about him specifically.

                Right. And the limit of the law, in this case, is lethal injection.

                You can’t sentence someone to die by a thousand cuts because that is cruel. Which violates the Constitution. Why is this not cruel? Because it’s faster?

                I don’t make up the rules, man. But you still haven’t said what would be the ideal in this situation.

                Let him spend the rest of his life in jail (something he did not want, and already tried to kill himself over), set him free, or “other”?

                You’d still have to consider the victims in this decision, so I’m curious to know how you’d do it.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Right. And the limit of the law, in this case, is lethal injection.

                  Which is cruel. Even if he specifically wants it. For reasons I explain.

                  I don’t make up the rules, man. But you still haven’t said what would be the ideal in this situation.

                  The ideal would be to do what every other civilized country on the planet does and not execute people. Even Anders Breivik wasn’t executed and he killed 77 people, many of them children. And no one in Norway who had any real influence seriously discussed bringing back the death penalty just for him. Because it is cruel.

                  Even SCOTUS decided it was cruel and halted it until they reversed their decision.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furman_v._Georgia

                  You’d still have to consider the victims in this decision, so I’m curious to know how you’d do it.

                  Our justice system is not about retribution. It has never been about retribution. Retribution is also unconstitutional for the same reason.

                  • Showroom7561
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Anders Breivik

                    Not to go off-topic, but that Nazi never asked to be put to death. It seems like the only complaint he’s made about his sentence is that the Playstation he uses while in prison is outdated, and that he doesn’t get more time to make phone calls.

                    [death by lethal injection] Which is cruel. Even if he specifically wants it.

                    Do you view medically assisted suicide as cruel?

                    If Creech asked for death by lethal injection as a form of assisted suicide, would granting that not be the embodiment of compassion towards him?

                    Cruelty implies that extreme unkindness is willingly being inflicted upon another person or animal with the desire to cause pain and suffering.

                    This definition does not match what we see here.