Ukraine’s embattled army chief, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, says Ukraine must adapt to a reduction in military aid from its key allies and focus ever more strongly on technology if it is to win its war against Russia.

In an exclusive essay for CNN, submitted amidst a swirl of rumors surrounding his future, Zaluzhnyi also addressed the challenge of mass mobilization, a source of tension between himself and President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The general’s article makes no reference to his relationship with the president, nor to reports Zelensky is poised to announce his dismissal after four years in the job, a move a source said could come within days.

Instead, the military commander seeks to build on an argument in an essay published three months ago, in addition to commenting for the first time on a series of political setbacks at home and abroad.

In that first essay, published in the Economist, Zaluzhnyi highlighted the importance of unmanned aerial vehicles and electronic warfare capabilities, as a priority for Ukraine, before concluding, “New innovative approaches can turn this war of position into one of maneuver.”

Zaluzhnyi’s characterization of the situation as a war of position – one defined by attrition and a lack of movement on the battlefield – amounted to a recognition that the Ukrainian counteroffensive, launched to great fanfare earlier in 2023, was effectively over.

  • breakfastmtn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    False.

    Neither myself nor the Kyiv Independent are pushing a Russian propaganda narrative. The dispute between Zelenksy and Zaluzhnyi is well-documented in Ukrainian media over the last week. In addition to the Kyiv Independent, it’s been covered by The New Voice of Ukraine, Ukrainska Pravda, and Euromaidan Press (and probably others). All of those media organizations are high credibility and none of them are known publishers of Russian propaganda.

    • Grant_M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Based on rumors from randoms with axes to grind. It’s BS.

        • Grant_M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “people familiar with the matter” More randoms.

          • breakfastmtn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That I don’t believe. There’s no way WaPo would publish with a rando source. They trusted the source enough that they published follow-up articles.

            Edit: looks like it was independently verified by Reuters too.

            • Grant_M
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They do it all the time. All of these originate to one rumor.