Boys and men from generation Z are more likely than older baby boomers to believe that feminism has done more harm than good, according to research that shows a “real risk of fractious division among this coming generation”.

On feminism, 16% of gen Z males felt it had done more harm than good. Among over-60s the figure was 13%.

The figures emerged from Ipsos polling for King’s College London’s Policy Institute and the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership. The research also found that 37% of men aged 16 to 29 consider “toxic masculinity” an unhelpful phrase, roughly double the number of young women who don’t like it.

“This is a new and unusual generational pattern,” said Prof Bobby Duffy, director of the Policy Institute. “Normally, it tends to be the case that younger generations are consistently more comfortable with emerging social norms, as they grew up with these as a natural part of their lives.”

Link to study: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/masculinity-and-womens-equality-study-finds-emerging-gender-divide-in-young-peoples-attitudes

  • undercrust
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    LOL, this dude’s been lucky enough to never read a strategically worded political poll apparently.

    All polls are inherently biased in their wording. Almost no poll-makers are non-partisan, and the people most likely to complete polls are often the most biased.

    Statistics baybeee! They’ll tell you whatever you want if you structure your intake datum properly!

    • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      LOL, this dude’s been lucky enough to never read a strategically worded political poll apparently.

      So why did women and men respond completely differently, if not because… they feel that way?

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It is impossible to have truly “objective” polling. There are the questions, there are the answers, and you assess within that context. We have standards and practices that help steer us towards higher quality input/output knowing that nothing is airtight.

      This is a nonsense standard of your own making. News, history, doesn’t matter. “Just the facts” and “true objectivity” are a noble dream at best (to borrow from Novick) and are unachievable. You do the best you can, account for biases/different narratives, and deliver the results. That’s always how it has been. It doesn’t make these fields totally arbitrary or worthless as you imply.