• voidavoid
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ya know, that actually accounts for three of the four paragraphs of the article.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, I count about 24 “paragraphs” (many are just single sentences), but you’re right, at least 3 of them discuss consequences, which unfortunately just amount to “Trump loses ‘control’ of his fraud businesses.”

      Given that his name is still on the building, and he “controls” them about as much as the average person “controls” their cat, I doubt anything comes of this.

      • lco@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        If the ruling survives the numerous appeals there will inevitably be, his business would ultimately be dissolved, with Trump only retaining whatever cash and property remains after everything is auctioned off and all debts and fines are paid (which might even amount to him just retaining unpaid debt). One can hope.

      • voidavoid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Welp, I guess either I missed everything past what appeared to be the bottom of the article, or they’ve since expanded it.

        Ah well, still 3 of the first 4 paragraphs discuss the matter. 🤷‍♂️