Britain’s landscape is highly fragmented by roads, with researchers from Cardiff University finding that more than 70% of the UK’s roadless areas are smaller than 1 km2. The researchers say that more than 60% of roadless patches in the UK are smaller than the typical area many common UK mammals need to survive, meaning species such as badgers and red foxes likely face a high risk of wildlife-vehicle collisions.

Dr. Sarah Raymond, who completed the work during her Ph.D. at Cardiff University School of Biosciences, said, "Roads cover 20% of land globally, fragmenting land into almost 600,000 patches.

“Because of this, roads have a wide range of impacts on wildlife, including reduced habitat connectivity and wildlife-vehicle collisions. Wildlife-vehicle collisions are estimated to cause millions of animal mortalities on roads every year and are a leading cause of population decline and biodiversity loss. Analyzing roadless areas is important for identifying areas of ecological value and intensifying conservation efforts.”

  • skisnow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    The researchers found that the total number of roadless patches across Great Britain was 6,138 with a 1 km road effect zone, 29,164 with a 500 m road effect zone, and 93,561 with a 100 m road effect zone. The majority (71–74%) of roadless patches were smaller than 1 km² in size, and a small minority (0.002-0.014%) were greater than 100 km2.

    There’s some mathematical shenanigans going on there. You don’t count the number of small patches, you count their total area, otherwise it’s misleading bordering on meaningless.

    • starik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly. If the whole upper half of GB was unpaved, it would only count as 1 roadless area, and add almost nothing to the percentages listed above.

      • skisnow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yup. As far as I can tell, their biggest area category represents a higher total area than their smallest one, by a factor of about 10.