Before you come at me with stuff like Librewolf, Waterfox and IceCat; those don’t count. They are just tweaked Firefox distros with mostly basic low level changes. Not every Chromium browser is super unique either, but I feel like there are more differences between them then there are with Firefox distros. Why is that? Why there aren’t different browsers that use Firefox’s engines but provide a different UX?

    • IngrownMink4
      link
      fedilink
      43 years ago

      It would be nice if Mozilla could make a project similar to Chromium Embedded Framework, in order to integrate the Gecko engine in apps (because currently Blink and V8 are used and the truth is that the performance is not very good) and even in game consoles Gecko could get a good market share. Servo was an step in the right direction.

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I wonder if this is significantly different with Servo. Servo isn’t really ready for as far as I can tell, but in a couple years it might be. (If there’s some kind of significant volunteer effort, given Mozilla fired everyone working on it.)

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        13 years ago

        I’ve already seen a company announcing a product that sounded a lot like Servo. But it was targeted for embedded use, so something where a limited number of supported webpages may be perfectly fine.

        Actually implementing all of the web standards into Servo, that’s just not going to happen. Mozilla and Google already struggle to keep up with web standards in Firefox and Chrome, and those have more than two decades of a headstart.

        That’s also why Mozilla ran Servo as a research project. They used it to explore a modern architecture, much of which they were able to retrofit into Firefox, but they didn’t work much on web standards.
        And yeah, when finances run thin, research projects are among the first things to go.