The question that the separatists were proposing was Do you agree that the province shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada? And the question that Lukaszuk proposed is Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?
The question that the separatists were proposing was Do you agree that the province shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada? And the question that Lukaszuk proposed is Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?
So if either petition gets enough signatures it triggers a referendum?
There can only be one petition because they are too similar. Basically, the separatists can’t submit their petition because Lukaszuk already submitted his.
I don’t know what happens if the threshold is met. I believe the Alberta government has to at least make a response to it, but even that I’m not sure.
Ah, I didn’t realize that bit. So realistically, just don’t sign it.
Except you’d want to sign it. It’s not a petition to leave, it’s a petition to stay.
The separatists were proposing a question “Do you agree that the province shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada?” which would mean even if, for example, 2 million Albertans refused to sign it, it wouldn’t matter if 177 thousand people agreed to do so. Under the new question, “Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?” if those 2 million Albertans signed the petition, it wouldn’t matter if those 177 thousand refused to sign it. Granted, it is a gamble because it’s easier to do a thing rather than not do a thing.
I could be wrong on his intentions, but considering that Lukaszuk is the head of a movement called Forever Canadian, and from his twitter it seems like he’s pro-Canada.
Edit: I meant it’s easier to not do a thing rather than do a thing, wording got mixed up there.
But AB is already a part of Canada. If no one signs it, it stays that way. If enough sign it, it triggers a referendum and thus, a risk.
Regardless of which petition got in, the real question for either is “sign if you want a referendum”. If you don’t want AB to leave, just don’t sign.
Unfortunately I suspect the damage is already done and a lot of Albertans are under the impression they should to sign the “stay” petition to save AB, which just gives the separatists exactly what they want - a referendum.
In an ideal world I’d agree with you. But if we lived in that world the UCP wouldn’t have formed government in the first place. And considering that our Opposition Leader has basically told Smith to put up or shut up, the referendum is happening regardless of whether it should.
But we don’t want a referendum. If no one signs, it doesn’t pass to get on the ballot. Whether the ballot says “do you want to stay?” Or “do you want to leave?” it’s the same question. Both petitions lead to the same place - a referendum.
The question right now isn’t whether or not you want to separate, it’s whether or not you want a referendum to put it up for a vote. If you want AB to stay, just don’t sign the petition. An actual referendum would be the worst thing AB can have, regardless of how the question is worded.
That is a good point, though the separatists themselves disagree, as they’re still working to submit their own petition. I guess the question remains of how many times a petition like this can be made. If this one fails, can the separatists put forward another one? That’s not going to be great. “Alberta couldn’t pass a petition to stay but could pass one to leave.”
Another thing to consider is our neighbour to the south. If the petition to leave passed, would they care that the threshold is extremely low, or that this doesn’t actually mean that Alberta has separated? It’s not like Trump has stopped believing that we should be the 51st state, and it’s not like anyone in the American government cares enough to stop him.
A petition to leave passing might compel Trump to “little green men” us, because, y’know, we “voted” for it.
To be frank we’re just in a really shitty situation.
It’s not about which one passes though, they both lead to the same place. It doesn’t matter what choice of words is used for the question to go on the ballot, we don’t want it to be an option at all. The real question both petitions ask is “do you want to have a vote to stay or leave?” If the petition (either one) doesn’t get enough signatures, it won’t be on the ballot at all, and there’s no vote at all.
Look at it this way: separatists want to vote to leave, so they want a referendum. This new guy says “I flipped it on em, get enough signatures now and the question won’t be do you want to leave? It’ll be do you want to stay?” They both have the same result, it’s on the ballot for referendum with the same question worded differently. The separatists get what they want, a referendum.
We live in the voodoo zone now. I would read everything with a hypercritical lens going forward when it comes to this government and this province. The murderer’s calls are coming from inside the house, when it comes to Alberta. It’s misinformation central.
Smart move