We do not need our bodies once we leave this world regardless of what you think happens after we die. We should be focused on curing diseases and extending the life of living humans. Science would go so far if we used human bodies after death instead of requiring people to give consent to something they don’t need.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      that’s like saying we should ignore DNR and save people despite their beliefs.

      my view is simple, against organ donations, don’t get them. simple as.

        • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          i think eye surgery is good, should said operation be forced on everyone? no, if you don’t want it, don’t get it.

          and you’re being disingenuous.

          all I said is that organ donations should be opt out, and it should go both ways.

          you’re the one who is trying to stretch it into racism.

          it’s subsidising milk racist because some ethnic communities have more lactose intolerant? no,

          and if some community tent to have more DNR, is it racist to respect it?

          instead of engaging in the ethic of someone who refuses to save lives but it’s ok to use other people’s organs, you just cry BS.

    • caurvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      These are not alike. We are talking about individuals choosing for themselves, before they die. If you choose not to share when you pass, why would you be prioritised over someone who was willing?

      Genuinely held beliefs or not, religion and spirituality have no role to play in the survival of a community system.