• xyro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Agreed, so why not built as advanced with European technology instead of old American tech ?

    • realitista@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is one of the few weapons systems that Europeans don’t have a decent analogue for. This is likely their short term plan while they develop something similar.

      Perun did a decent overview of the capabilities that Europe has in house vs those that they must rely on the US for if you are interested in more details.

      • xyro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Make more sense thanks ! I’ll take a look at the overview !

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I imagine there’s also an element of “what can we start building right now,” as opposed to waiting a couple of years for R&D before setting up the production lines. A weapon system can be the most wonderful and powerful thing on paper but if you’re under attack you can’t deploy a piece of paper.

          It’s also nice that it turns out old American tech is perfectly capable of dominating Russia’s current tech.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Quantity is also important. We can’t just rely on a few high-tech systems, we need volumes of simpler equipment as well. These systems are good candidates for stuff we can mass produce right now.