• AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      French press is an immersion brewing method, also typically unfiltered. It produces a mellower, more full-bodied brew. Pour-over is a percolation brewing method, typically filtered. It produces stronger, clearer flavors with less body. Both are excellent, cheap alternatives to using an auto drip machine and will absolutely produce better coffee than most pod machines. Which brew method is better depends on personal preferences.

    • ytorf@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      For old man reasons: coffee oils can raise cholesterol in some people and using a paper filter lowers the oil levels

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m somewhat incredulous. I don’t mean that in a “you’re totally wrong you idiot” kind of way, just that I’m surprised I haven’t heard it before. I’m a cardio patient and drink too much coffee all day long.

        • kadup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They’re correct, but also exaggerating it. If you ask somebody to brew you a cup using a french press, and using the same ground coffee, a batch of a pour over, you’ll notice some oils floating on the french press cup and not the pour over. So indeed, the paper filter will remove lipids from the brew. But are those in a quantity that could “raise cholesterol in some people”? Absolutely not, you’d have to be chugging coffee like a monster and even then, the tablespoon of butter you use in your toast is a much bigger concern.