I’m wondering about the Luigi line.

Post Trump, it seems as if there is no justice for the rich besides vigilante justice.

Would any of the below qualify for a Luigi? Where is the line? I find the cognitive ethical dissonance of Luigi disconcerting.

The following list is very dark, and super cynical - I apologize in advance.


A pharma company has found a cure for cancer, but suppresses it to make money on treatment. Causing innumerable deaths.

A pharma company has found a cure for Alzheimer’s - but suppresses it. Causing suffering.

A pharma company knows a drug treatment is ineffective for some major illness, but pushes it anyway, suppressing other research. Causing suffering.

A pharma company pushes a drug known to cause massive dependence, with insignificant benefit. Causing suffering.

A car company knows an airbag is defective, and does not fix it. Causing thousands of deaths.

An airplane manufacturer creates an airplane with faulty construction, knowingly, and thousands die.

A manufacturing company pollutes a town’s water, causing birth defects, general sickness.


This list could go on forever of course. But where is the line post Luigi, post Trump non-trial. What makes one CEO at risk, and another not?

  • ShadowA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I don’t condone murder of anyone, so there is no Luigi line for me. I can certainly understand why it happened and empathize, but would not support more.

    That being said, the latter 4 items are worthy of executives going to jail. The first 3 don’t cause suffering as you stated, just prolong it.

    • fishabel@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      But the only solution to a system that will never put them behind bars and shows no sign of changing is Luigi. They did it to themselves, don’t feel pity. It’s self defense, not murder.